Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> writes: > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:55:20AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: >> Well, given my apparent discrepance between coding and social >> interaction skills, the resulting dearth of actually useful advice and >> other things (recently a patch of mine was rejected that actually would >> have brought some oversights in line with the rest), I think that it >> might be the smoothest course of action if I just had commit access >> myself. > > The rejected patch is unfortunate, but in the near future I think > we'll continue to see good things sometimes being rejected. Most > developers (including Carl) only know bits and pieces of the > architecture, so a lot of patches won't be understood.
That's not a good situation. Developers come and go. So it would seem like a good idea to make the architecture more transparent. Part of that is documentation, part of it is simplification. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
