David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes: > I have no idea what I am doing here. In particular not with the > \override, and the set-object-property!. Can somebody explain to me > just what data structures I happen to manipulate, and how a user is > actually _supposed_ to be mangling them?
Well, given my apparent discrepance between coding and social interaction skills, the resulting dearth of actually useful advice and other things (recently a patch of mine was rejected that actually would have brought some oversights in line with the rest), I think that it might be the smoothest course of action if I just had commit access myself. Unfortunately, Lilypond does not readily lend itself to extension just in source files, so some of the functionality I need implemented needs to be put into the source, and it would be a pity if it was not generally available. I think I would like some more modularization; it does not make much sense that everybody has harp pedal functionality loaded by default. Or accordion functionality. But at the moment I don't feel fit for rearchitecturing, it will be enough work to extend Lilypond in style for my purposes. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
