Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> writes: > On 11/21/09 12:55 AM, "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> Well, given my apparent discrepance between coding and social >> interaction skills, the resulting dearth of actually useful advice >> and other things (recently a patch of mine was rejected that actually >> would have brought some oversights in line with the rest), > > I don't think your patch was rejected. It was just not immediately > applied. > > Sometimes it takes a while to get patches approved through the system. > > I would like to suggest that you post patches on Rietveld, rather than > directly to the -devel list. That's the current recommended procedure > (see the Contributors' Guide for more information). You'll get > comments from more than just me, and that will facilitate things.
That course of action is appropriate for changes of semantics or new functionality. It is utter overkill for janitorial work and documentation clarification. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
