Hi,
Could it be an option to make <c e g>4*8 do the obvious thing?
Or even { <c e g>4 }*8 ?
That would be so much more natural. The first already does something,
but not something which I would call useful.
I use it all the time, actually.
The second bombs out. In contrast, q feels rather hackish.
Since the patch (as I understand it) ensures that q does not
duplicate anything except the notes, q allows for
<c e g>8-. q-^ q-. q-^
etc., right? Obviously, this would *not* be possible with something like
<c e g>4*8
Cheers,
Kieren.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
