>> OTOH, something like >> { <c e g>8-. <c e g>-^ }*2 >> >> is not doable with the q approach. > > Why not? > > \repeat unfold 2 { <c e g>8-. q-^ } > > Please stop trying to overload the * operator.
Well, David has a point here IMHO: The `\repeat unfold' really is neither elegant nor intuitive nor quickly to type. I don't mind overloading the `*' operator after a group within braces. If overloading is really that bad for some of you, we could even introduce, say, `**' to have a different operator. Werner _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel