>> OTOH, something like
>> { <c e g>8-. <c e g>-^ }*2
>>
>> is not doable with the q approach.
>
> Why not?
>
> \repeat unfold 2 { <c e g>8-. q-^ }
>
> Please stop trying to overload the * operator.
Well, David has a point here IMHO: The `\repeat unfold' really is
neither elegant nor intuitive nor quickly to type. I don't mind
overloading the `*' operator after a group within braces. If
overloading is really that bad for some of you, we could even
introduce, say, `**' to have a different operator.
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
