>> OTOH, something like
>> { <c e g>8-. <c e g>-^ }*2
>> 
>> is not doable with the q approach.
> 
> Why not?
> 
> \repeat unfold 2 { <c e g>8-. q-^ }
> 
> Please stop trying to overload the * operator.

Well, David has a point here IMHO: The `\repeat unfold' really is
neither elegant nor intuitive nor quickly to type.  I don't mind
overloading the `*' operator after a group within braces.  If
overloading is really that bad for some of you, we could even
introduce, say, `**' to have a different operator.


    Werner


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to