Marc Hohl <m...@hohlart.de> writes: > David Kastrup schrieb: >> [...] >> But *4 is _logical_. You can guess what it does without looking it up >> in the manual. >> > No. Since it looks like a multiplication, it treats the number, not > the notes (at least for me). So < c e g>4*4 could be interpreted as > < c e g >16, which is not what we want.
So you think one should prohibit R1*8 since people might confuse it with R8? I don't buy that argument. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
