2008/10/3 Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> I'm simply suggesting that we should use (or there should be a) >> Texi2XHMTL rather than Texi2HTML. > > Ahh, this is something *completely* different :-) XHTML is fine -- the > closing tags (not necessary in HTML) are good for humans too, but XML > is normally far too verbose.
In the handcoded pages (we have plenty) I vote to go towards XHTML. Reason: good for humans. Another reason: we are nearly there, we have begun closing <p> and <li> and even <br /> which BTW gives a warning at the w3c validator. <img /> and maybe a few others still left. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
