> I'm simply suggesting that we should use (or there should be a) > Texi2XHMTL rather than Texi2HTML.
Ahh, this is something *completely* different :-) XHTML is fine -- the
closing tags (not necessary in HTML) are good for humans too, but XML
is normally far too verbose.
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
