-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2008 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> Hi all,
>
> > The current docs are HTML 4.01
>
> Is there some good reason for this?

Yes, texi2html creates HTML 4.01 ;-)

> FTR, HTML 4.01 is nearly 11 years old…  ;-)

So.... Are there any other reasons against HTML 4.01 other than that it was 
specified a decade ago?

Cheers,
Reinhold
- -- 
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, Vienna University of Technology, Austria
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
 * Financial and Actuarial Mathematics, TU Wien, http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/
 * K Desktop Environment, http://www.kde.org, KOrganizer maintainer
 * Chorvereinigung "Jung-Wien", http://www.jung-wien.at/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFI5PCWTqjEwhXvPN0RAiDVAKCizeH5nisyoRQ4kXz/tQWA1RovRQCgsHUN
0DNr8dPqgpYdu7jKejL2zBo=
=k5DD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to