On 4/22/2020 10:02 PM, Ryan Birmingham wrote: > If I'm not mistaken, MIT-0 would probably not be recommended for the > same reasons that the unlicense is not. > --Ryan The Unlicense has been submitted to License-Review and the review is pending. If you have objections to it, then you should raise them there. No one has mentioned any way in which it doesn't meet the OSD.
Pam Pamela S. Chestek Chestek Legal PO Box 2492 Raleigh, NC 27602 919-800-8033 pam...@chesteklegal.com www.chesteklegal.com
_______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
