On 4/22/20 7:33 PM, Richard Fontana wrote: > It seems likely it would be approved, given the approval a few years > ago of the similar, ISC-based license now known as Zero-Clause BSD, > though perhaps some would object on anti-proliferation grounds.
Here is my non-proliferation question: Is there significant use of MIT-0 in the field? I would argue that, if there's nobody using it, we shouldn't approve it as "technically OSS but not really needed". But if projects are using it, then approve it as a "redundant" license. -- Josh Berkus _______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
