Moving to license-review, since it is discussing a license currently under review.
On 4/24/2020 10:38 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > “Unlicense” is a PD dedication, not a licence, and therefore > not portable to at least a good part of the EU, unusable both > for consumers and creators. I have to treat stuff under the > “Unlicense” as proprietary unlicenced unusable crap. Can you explain what about it makes it equivalent to proprietary? How is this not sufficient: "Anyone is free to copy, modify, publish, use, compile, sell, or distribute this software, either in source code form or as a compiled binary, for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial, and by any means." How would an EU court reach a conclusion about the use of the software under this license that is contrary to the OSD? Pam Pamela S. Chestek Chestek Legal PO Box 2492 Raleigh, NC 27602 919-800-8033 pam...@chesteklegal.com www.chesteklegal.com _______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
