> April 24, 2020 7:41 AM, "Thorsten Glaser" <t...@mirbsd.de> wrote: > > “Unlicense” is a PD dedication, not a licence, and therefore > not portable to at least a good part of the EU, unusable both > for consumers and creators. I have to treat stuff under the > “Unlicense” as proprietary unlicenced unusable crap.
The second paragraph of Unlicense is a license, at least as much of a license as BSD or MIT has (or, for that matter, the back up license in CC0): "Anyone is free to copy, modify, publish, use, compile, sell, or distribute this software, either in source code form or as a compiled binary, for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial, and by any means." _______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
