On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote: > Qrux wrote: > >> If LFS is just a source code project, then to some extent you can say that >> prose style or organization is irrelevant. It's not, because it's often >> repeated that it's a book, as well. So, style is important, because >> organization can aid understanding. > > The descriptions and the organization is important, but it satisfies most > users. > We probably go through this discussion two are three time a year. Each time > it's a single user that doesn't quite get it (you got it without problem). > Since we have over 23000 registered users, I'd say that the vast majority get > value from the book as it is. I'm not willing to make major changes for a > vocal > few. We will have to agree to disagree and move on. >
Just because not many emails or voices out their opinion(s) like @Qrux has done, doesn't mean that they get it. They may not be able to put forth their thoughts like @Qrux has done. LFS is a fantastic resource, but like @Qrux is saying, there is room for improvement to make it even better. If some information on how to contribute in terms of improving the content or presentation style in the "How to contribute" (http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/contribute.html) page will be helpful and I would like to pitch in whatever ways I can. cheers... -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
