> I would like to hear from Jim and everyone working on the header project > regarding this possibility: > > Find the headers that llh currently lacks that glibc-2.3.6 and > linux-2.6.16.x both support and patch them into llh. The only thing that > comes to mind is inotify support. Headers that have become drastically > different are a concern, though, as that adds to the testing time. > > > -- > Archaic >
What about using kernel headers for building glibc, and linux-libc-headers for userspace, like we used to do? My understanding is that the glibc developers are still using/recommending this anyhow. Would certainly be the easiest solution. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
