Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 4/9/06, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Just to verify, glibc-2.4 and gcc-4.1 for LFS-6.2? >> Yes. I haven't heard of anyone testing these yet, but after the udev >> update, adding them into trunk really wouldn't take long. There is no >> reason that a mid May release couldn't happen. That would give a month >> of testing. > > I think we should be honest that updating a minor version of glibc is > no ordinary update. I recall Greg saying he hasn't had a lot of > problems with it, and the CLFS guys seem to be using it fine, but this > needs more than a couple weeks in the cooker, IMO. > > I just want to state for the record that I think that lumping > glibc-2.4 in just because we're trying to make a release is a bad > idea. Glibc affects practically (probably) every single package in > the system. This is not on the same scale as removing hotplug.
How long do you think does it needs to be tested? -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
