On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 10:08:07AM +0100, Matt Darcy wrote: > > The kernel headers are not really ready for consideration for use at the > moment as I see it, we've not even decided which way to go with headers, > let alone got the header script to a point that could be considered stable. > > I'd leave the headers on the current revision for the next release.
I would like to hear from Jim and everyone working on the header project regarding this possibility: Find the headers that llh currently lacks that glibc-2.3.6 and linux-2.6.16.x both support and patch them into llh. The only thing that comes to mind is inotify support. Headers that have become drastically different are a concern, though, as that adds to the testing time. -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
