On 8/5/05, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > steve crosby wrote these words on 08/04/05 19:56 CST: > > > Regardless, if the end user doesn't like/want the policy, all that's > > required is to skip this package installation, much the same as people > > can currently skip things like gettext, module-init tools, etc. > > I'm not sure about that. My testing (which I'm currently doing as I type > this) shows that we will have to pass --with-libcrack in the Shadow > instructions. This means that for folks who don't want to install the > CrackLib package, they will have to modify the default LFS instructions. >
Even using --with-libcrack, if no cracklib is found, configure and make merrily proceed without error and build the binaries - I'm not able to test the resulting binaries are workable for a few hours however ;) -- - Steve Crosby -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
