Tushar Teredesai wrote: > The problem is that BLFS assumes that you have built *all* package in > LFS. So if you skip a package, you are a pariah when you post to > BLFS-support :-) > > That is one reason I don't prefer packages being added to LFS, it > takes away the options. >
I don't follow this. Isn't blfs-support the place for all beyond LFS support questions. It's not limited to BLFS packages, so why should there be a 'complete' lfs assumption. R. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
