On 8/4/05, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Randy McMurchy wrote: > > > However, LFS history has shown that we cannot count on such a document > > to become formalized. > > I'm not sure if a formal set of rules is in fact possible. If we > consider the packages that are in the book at the moment,
My suggestion was not to base the rules based on the packages that are currently in the book but first formalize and then see how the current list of packages fit in. Else, each time a pacakge is suggested we go thru the same sort of discussion. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
