Yes. Because we should have managed our transfer business better and just got Koumas (not saying we should mind, he brings his own set of problems with him), rather than losing however much we have (let's say 50-100,000 as a conservative estimate when you consider loss on transfer, tax, agent's fees, signing on costs) on the Livermore deal.
How come no other manager finds themselves in the position of signing some and then realising within a week they don't want them? >Even if we end up with Koumas instead of LIvermore? ******* This message and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete this message and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to any other person. For further information about Clifford Chance please see our website at http://www.cliffordchance.com or refer to any Clifford Chance office. _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist oh alright then :-)
