Re: [LU] Livermore!

Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:57:23 -0700

 
>>Yes. Because we should have managed our transfer business better and just
got Koumas (not saying we should mind, he brings his own set of problems
with him), rather than losing however much we have (let's say 50-100,000 as
a conservative estimate when you consider loss on transfer, tax, agent's
fees, signing on costs) on the Livermore deal.<<
But how much is Livermore on compared to the mystery player? Can't imagine Ken Bates has taken too bad a hit on this deal.
 
Is Clifford Chance a management consultancy?  I take it you don't work in that department!
 
Mark ;-)
 

Reply via email to