The plural form needs to be changed for *sat *too. It should be: Plural-Forms: nplurals=3; plural=n==1 ? 0 : n==2 ? 1 : 2;
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 7:56 AM Prasanta Hembram < prasantahembram...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, Andras > > Ol Chiki is now widely accepted among Santhals, I barely see anyone > working on Devanagari, though some Indian government websites and digital > resources earlier used Devanagari script along with Ol Chiki, there are > efforts to make Ol Chiki script an official one. I tried to contact the Dev > translator but got no response, and he is not maintaining translations > anymore. Devanagari was used when Ol Chiki was not unicoded/not universally > supported, but now it is widely supported. I think it would be better to > use the sat code for Ol Chiki script. I have started adding new and > transcribing the old translations. > > regards > Prasanta Hembram > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 11:50 PM Andras Timar <tima...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Prasanta, >> >> sat-Olck has not been added to LibreOffice source code, yet. The old sat >> translation is part of LibreOffice. It is written with Devanagari script. >> As far as I'm concerned this translation is not maintained. So the fastest >> and easiest for you would be, if you used the sat language code for your >> work (unless someone heavily opposes this idea). This way you would see >> something sooner. Probably you will see "tofu" characters all around, as >> I'm not sure that Ol Chiki is supported by UI fonts, but fixing this is >> less work than adding a new language. >> (My suggestion is based on the Wikipedia article >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santali_language which states that Ol >> Chiki as a Santali script is widely accepted among Santal communities.) >> >> Best regards, >> Andras Timar >> >> On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 7:49 PM Prasanta Hembram < >> prasantahembram...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, I’m currently working on the Santali (Ol Chiki) (sat-Olck) >>> translation, >>> which is at 40% completion. I would like to see how it looks in a build. >>> Is >>> there a minimum threshold for inclusion in a beta build? I’ve downloaded >>> and tested the latest build from >>> https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily >>> /master/ <https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/>, but >>> Santali (Ol Chiki) still isn’t included in the software. >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks >>> with best regards >>> Prasanta Hembram >>> >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org >>> Problems? >>> https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ >>> Posting guidelines + more: >>> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette >>> List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/ >>> Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy >>> >> > > -- > Thanks > with best regards > Prasanta Hembram > -- Thanks with best regards Prasanta Hembram -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
