So Flesner's airplane is about 8" longer than the KR2S design; do I have that right? As a data point, I'm really enjoying flying Roy Marsh's N133RM just as it was built. It defined the "2S" dimension and has the flat "airfoil", 71 inch-wide tail feathers. And like Langford reported about Jim Faughn's very-standard KR2 airplane, I believe Roy's airplane DOES fly substantially easier than the "standard" KR2 I had previously. Not to say the KR2 is a bad design, but the KR2S is easier to pilot. I know the "even more stretched" fuselage has a big following. SO can we have some other input from pilots operating the standard KR2S fuselage dimension for the sake of comparison please? John Bouyea N133RM KR-2S OR81/ Hillsboro, OR
Subject: Re: KR> Alright guys, it's time..... My KR is stretched 24" over the standard KR2 and that's not too much, especially with mine having the standard KR2 tail feathers. Larry Flesner _______________________________________________ Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/. Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html. see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change options. To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
