I would think NAFTA was low in the priority list as it did not help the Mexican truckers trying to drive their 18 wheelers into the US w/o meeting US DOT regs.
-dave John Gotschall wrote: > 2 things, > > > In the regs just posted (e) 4 seems to indicate that while flying off > the 40 hours (testing) it is NOT required, did I get that right? (I > concur w/Mark L, these 40 hrs are not a good time to be without one). > > Canada's regs imposes a unilateral trade restriction. I wonder if Nafta > or other treaty(s) might trump those regs? > > jg > > > >> _______________________________________ >> Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp >> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net >> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html >> > > > _______________________________________ > Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html >
