The API uses: "internally assigned biblio identifier" El mar., 23 oct. 2018 a las 10:32, Irma Birchall (<i...@calyx.net.au>) escribió:
> Hi Liz and Barton, > > About "I think the most accurate long form representation is "Koha > internal record number", as the biblionumber has nothing at all to do with > MARC" > > I received this feedback from Libraries Australia today : > > *MARC Field 035 $a - System Control Number : Koha Record Numbers* <> > Every record should have one instance of MARC field 035 containing the > current Koha record number before re-exporting. > > So simply call biblionumber <> "Koha record number"? > > Irma > CALYX > > > > On 23 October 2018 at 09:03, Liz Rea <l...@catalyst.net.nz> wrote: > >> Personally, I'd probably convert any "Biblio number" into >> "Biblionumber," and if that needs explaining, it's the "Koha internal >> record number" or "Koha unique record identifier" >> >> >> On 23/10/18 09:02, Barton Chittenden wrote: >> > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 3:39 PM Liz Rea <l...@catalyst.net.nz> wrote: >> > >> >> The term bibliographic number is easily confused with "inventory >> number" >> >> and any local or old internal record numbers that migrated MARC may >> have. >> >> >> > Agreed, bibliographic number is confusing. >> > >> >> I think the most accurate long form representation is "Koha internal >> >> record number", as the biblionumber has nothing at all to do with >> MARC, and >> >> wouldn't necessarily be carried over to another system if the record >> was >> >> moved (not that anybody would *leave* Koha, amirite). >> >> >> >> With that in mind, I don't see why we would need to drop biblionumber >> at >> >> all - it references exactly what it is, is specific to Koha, and can be >> >> understood and trained in that context, fully independent of MARC. >> >> >> > I think the use of biblionumber is fine in context -- that's generally >> used >> > specifically when database tables are being mentioned. The term 'Biblio >> > number' (containing a space) is what I'm more concerned about. I don't >> know >> > that the marc editor was the only place that I saw that used. >> > >> >> -- >> -- >> Liz Rea >> Catalyst.Net Limited >> Level 6, Catalyst House, >> 150 Willis Street, Wellington. >> P.O Box 11053, Manners Street, >> Wellington 6142 >> 04 803 2265 >> >> GPG: B149 A443 6B01 7386 C2C7 F481 B6c2 A49D 3726 38B7 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Koha-devel mailing list >> Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org >> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >> > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ -- Tomás Cohen Arazi Theke Solutions (http://theke.io) ✆ +54 9351 3513384 GPG: B2F3C15F
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
