On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 10:14 AM Owen Leonard <oleon...@myacpl.org> wrote:
> > I'm starting with looking for instances of 'biblio', which should be > 'Bibliographic record'. > > Hopefully Bug 19833 took care of (most of?) them. > https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19833 I found a dozen or so in master. > > I'm wondering about instances of "Biblio number" in the text... I think > that > > "Bibliographic number" is actually *less* clear... "Bibliographic Record > Number" > > is better, but in most cases where Biblio number is used (e.g. the Marc > Editor), > > Biblio number makes sense in its context. > > As a human-readable term I prefer "Bibliographic record number." > However, operations which reference biblionumber should all be fairly > technical, and thus a technical term might be appropriate. I'm curious > what edge cases there might be that don't fall into the "technical" > category. > Most of the ones that I found were via grepping, I'm going to be looking at them in more detail shortly, so I'll have more context. > On the other hand, if we expect these more technical users to know > what biblionumber is... how did they learn? > I'm guessing that most probably learn from the URL or the database schema/reports library. It depends on level of expertise, I'm sure. I suppose I could ask on the koha general mailing list... --Barton
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
