A Sunday, May 15, 2011, Nikos Chantziaras va escriure: > On 05/15/2011 04:03 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:43:45 Michael Jansen wrote: > >> On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:04:34 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > >>> On Sunday 15 May 2011 13:36:14 Luciano Montanaro wrote: > >>>> A feature like this should not be implemented in a style, IMHO, styles > >>>> should be limited to changing the look, not the behaviour of widgets, > >>>> and for sure it should not be the default behaviour. > >>> > >>> you are fighting windmills here. Reality is that the styles can change > >>> the behavior and they do so. Claiming they should not, does not fix > >>> anything. The only difference is that you are not aware of a style > >>> "breaking" your app if it is not default. > >> > >> So you say the default kde style is entitled to break kde application at > >> will because there are other styles out there which do it already? Is > >> that really a accepted kde policy? > >> > >> Sometimes i wonder. > > > > So you think we should better disable the feature and close the eyes > > although we know that there are bugs with other styles (including for > > example the quite popular Ubuntu default style)? > > I believe that there was an error in choosing a correct configuration > scheme and defaults. By default, it would make more sense to enable > this feature only for the menu bar, so that title and menu bar gets > unified. And possibly the toolbar too, as it's usually under the menu > bar. An additional setting, that applies the feature to the whole > application window, would by default be disabled. > > That sounds to me like the best middle ground.
I would be happy enough for that, if we do that it means that the user has to make an active choice to make the style act in an agreessive (and as we've seen wrong) way. Albert > > >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to > >> unsubscribe << >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
