On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:43:45 Michael Jansen wrote: > On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:04:34 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > On Sunday 15 May 2011 13:36:14 Luciano Montanaro wrote: > > > A feature like this should not be implemented in a style, IMHO, styles > > > should be limited to changing the look, not the behaviour of widgets, > > > and for sure it should not be the default behaviour. > > > > you are fighting windmills here. Reality is that the styles can change the > > behavior and they do so. Claiming they should not, does not fix anything. > > The only difference is that you are not aware of a style "breaking" your > > app if it is not default. > > So you say the default kde style is entitled to break kde application at will > because there are other styles out there which do it already? Is that really a > accepted kde policy? > > Sometimes i wonder. So you think we should better disable the feature and close the eyes although we know that there are bugs with other styles (including for example the quite popular Ubuntu default style)? I prefer getting the bugs fixed. > > > So yes, all applications have to be fixed, not the style. > > Really. > > Mike > > > > > Cheers > > Martin > > >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe > >> <<
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
