OmniaGM commented on PR #15968: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15968#issuecomment-2821595902
> > @OmniaGM : Thanks for the updated PR. A few more comments. > > Also, could you run producer performance test to make sure there is no performance degradation with this PR? Thanks. > > I have ran quick perf tests locally with 3 brokers (with 3 dedicated controllers in kraft mode), topic has 10 partitions and 3 replicas > > ``` > kafka-producer-perf-test.sh \ > --producer-props bootstrap.servers=localhost:9092 linger.ms=100 batch.size=10000 acks=-1 \ > --topic test-topic --num-records 5000000 --record-size 1024 --throughput -1 > ``` > > The output was the following the MB/sec is more/ or less the same with close avg latency. There is some diff in max latency and p99.99th > measurement with topic id without topic id > records/sec. 17968.9 17986.4 > MB/sec. 17.55. 17.56. > avg latency. 1666.01ms 1664.09 > max latency. 10589.00ms 9798.00ms > 50th. 1516ms. 1461ms > 95th, 2216ms. 2563ms > 99th, 5134ms. 5266ms > 99.9th. 9182ms. 8498ms ran the perf test again after pulling latest changes on trunk and the results seems to be better | measurement | with topic id | without topic id | | --------------- | ------------ | ---------------- | | records/sec. | 21351.5 | 20944.3 | | MB/sec. | 20.85 | 20.45 | | avg latency. | 1401.52 ms | 1426.69 ms | | max latency. | 7828.00 ms| 8680.00 ms | | 50th. | 1243 ms. | 1292 ms | | 95th, | 1979 ms. | 2169 ms | | 99th, | 5279 ms. | 4521 ms | | 99.9th. | 6774 ms. | 7605 ms | -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
