OmniaGM commented on PR #15968:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15968#issuecomment-2821525320

   > @OmniaGM : Thanks for the updated PR. A few more comments.
   > 
   > Also, could you run producer performance test to make sure there is no 
performance degradation with this PR? Thanks.
   
   I have ran quick perf tests locally with 3 brokers (with 3 dedicated 
controllers in kraft mode), topic has 10 partitions and 3 replicas 
   ```
   kafka-producer-perf-test.sh \
    --producer-props bootstrap.servers=localhost:9092 linger.ms=100 
batch.size=10000 acks=-1 \
    --topic test-topic --num-records 5000000 --record-size 1024 --throughput -1
   ```
   
   The output was the following 
   the MB/sec is more/ or less the same with close avg latency. There is some 
diff in max latency and p99.99th
   
   |  measurement |  with topic id | without topic id |
   | --------------- | ------------ | ---------------- |
   | records/sec.     |  17968.9       | 17986.4             |
   | MB/sec.            |  17.55.           | 17.56.                 |
   | avg latency.      | 1666.01ms   |  1664.09            |
   | max latency.     | 10589.00ms| 9798.00ms |
   | 50th.                 | 1516ms.       | 1461ms  |
   | 95th,                 | 2216ms.      | 2563ms |
   | 99th,                 | 5134ms.      | 5266ms |
   | 99.9th.              | 9182ms.      |   8498ms  |
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to