[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > um, excuse me, maybe I didn't get your point but what is wrong about > > RTFM? > > A naked RTFM is not terribly helpful - an RTFM which consists solely > of 'oh, just read the fscking manual'. It's not what's said, it's how its said. The classic example is of someone with RTFM printed on the palm of their hand so they can "answer" any questions without taking their eyes off their monitor. Kathryn Hogg _______________________________________________ issues mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/issues
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization psyche
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Telsa Gwynne
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Gina Lanik
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Nancy Corbett
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Mary Gardiner
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization jenn
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Gina Lanik
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization jenn
- RE: [issues] Conversation monopolization Kathryn Hogg
- RE: [issues] Conversation monopolization Ms. Piglet
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Gina Lanik
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Mary Gardiner
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Kathryn Hogg
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Julie
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Akkana
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Gina Lanik
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Jen Hamilton
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Telsa Gwynne
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization jenn