Gina Lanik wrote:
> um, excuse me, maybe I didn't get your point but what is wrong about
> RTFM?
A naked RTFM is not terribly helpful - an RTFM which consists solely
of 'oh, just read the fscking manual'.
An RTFM of the sort you described 'man whatever has the information
you need, in the section about such-and-so' is helpful, and there's
nothing wrong with THAT sort. In fact, there's everything right with
it.
Jenn V.
--
"Do you ever wonder if there's a whole section of geek culture
you miss out on by being a geek?" - Dancer.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jenn Vesperman http://www.simegen.com/~jenn/
_______________________________________________
issues mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/issues
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Rick Scott
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization psyche
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Telsa Gwynne
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Gina Lanik
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Nancy Corbett
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Mary Gardiner
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization jenn
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Gina Lanik
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization jenn
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Kathryn Hogg
- RE: [issues] Conversation monopolization Ms. Piglet
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Gina Lanik
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Mary Gardiner
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Kathryn Hogg
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Julie
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Akkana
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Gina Lanik
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Jen Hamilton
- Re: [issues] Conversation monopolization Telsa Gwynne
