On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, srl wrote: > Then again, some of us *choose* names that will deliberately confuse > people. ;) I'd rather play with people's assumptions about what "male" > and "female" mean. What better way for someone to question their > assumptions about gender than for them to assume I'm male because I'm > a technical person, then find out otherwise? hear hear yup of course, I also have an evil streak and like to screw with people's perception of their world in general, as well :P V. _______________________________________________ issues mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/issues
- Re: [issues] names [was: Anyone know any mo... Annette Stroud
- Re: [issues] names [was: Anyone know any mo... Vinnie
- Re: [issues] names [was: Anyone know any mo... Annette Stroud
- Re: [issues] names [was: Anyone know any mo... curious
- Re: [issues] names [was: Anyone know any mo... Deirdre Saoirse
- Re: [issues] names [was: Anyone know any mo... Ian Hall-Beyer
- Re: [issues] names [was: Anyone know any mo... Vinnie
- Re: [issues] names [was: Anyone know any mo... Christian MacAuley
- Re: [issues] names [was: Anyone know any mo... Kirrily 'Skud' Robert
- Re: [issues] names [was: Anyone know any mo... srl
- Re: [issues] Anyone know any more about thi... Vinnie
- Re: [issues] Anyone know any more about this st... curious
- Re: [issues] Anyone know any more about this study? lou