curious wrote: > Sounds good to me :).. I think nothing should be done :).. Fine. We've got that. We understand your argument, and respectfully disagree. You can now relax, knowing you've made your point. As the list has, for two days, attempted to explain our side to you - and you don't seem to be getting it, I request that you refrain from asking for further explanation. Getting nowhere at all is no fun. Jenn V. -- Humans are the only species to feed and house entirely separate species for no reason other than the pleasure of their company. Why? [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jenn Vesperman http://www.simegen.com/~jenn/ ************ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
- Re: [issues] Why women should have equality/equivilency srl
- Re: [issues] Why women should have equality/equivilency Jennifer Radtke
- Re: [issues] Why women should have equality/equivilency Jenn V.
- Re: [issues] Why women should have equality/equivilency Deirdre Saoirse
- Re: [issues] Why women should have equality/equivilency Janus
- Re: [issues] Why women should have equality/equivilency curious
- Re: [issues] Why women should have equality/equivilency Deirdre Saoirse
- [issues] MS vs DOJ, etc Dakota Surmonde
- Re: [issues] MS vs DOJ and capitalism.... Janus
- Re: [issues] MS vs DOJ, etc curious
- Re: [issues] MS vs DOJ, etc jenn
- Re: [issues] MS vs DOJ, etc Dakota Surmonde
- Re: [issues] MS vs DOJ, etc curious
- Re: [issues] MS vs DOJ, etc curious
- Re: [issues] MS vs DOJ, etc Deirdre Saoirse
- Re: [issues] MS vs DOJ, etc Deirdre Saoirse
- Re: [issues] MS vs DOJ, etc curious
- Re: [issues] MS vs DOJ, etc Nicole
- Re: [issues] MS vs DOJ, etc Deirdre Saoirse
- Re: [issues] MS vs DOJ, etc Dakota Surmonde
- Re: [issues] MS vs DOJ, etc Caitlyn Martin