> Being in aancient days" that as a biologists(bio or bo for short) some of it
> sounded pretrty shakey. Awful had to project bird behavior to humasnas and
> with pick your specoees. Chimps and Bobonanos are top faves d3epending on
> your views. Discovery channel stuff is ovtern biologically skewed, so sawyeth
> in in my npt so humn;e pomopm/
It seemed pretty legit, discussing the genetics of the X and Y
chromosomes that make us the physical gender we are ("mental" or
psychological gender determined differently) having been around for much
longer than was first assumed.
I really like the discovery channel (and the learning channel), but it's
mostly due to my "must feed on science and other cool interesting stuff"
attitude. Appetite for knowledge, I guess :o)
I am, of course, not a biologist so I cannot take the same position as
you can. I also don't tend to watch the shows on animals unless it's
cats (of any size) or humans :o)
Additionally, the history channel is showing something on the "history
of sex" all week long. It should be interesting to see how they deal
with issues of non-physical gender (i.e. I may physically be male, but I
know I am female type gender issues).
-nicole
--
http://colby.dhs.org @ Colby - me!
http://ghettobox.dhs.org \|/ ghettoBOX - home!
http://nightspell.dhs.org | NightSpell - irc.dal.net!
http://technopagan.dhs.org / \ TechnoPagan - spirituality!
************
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
