zhijiangW commented on a change in pull request #8416: [FLINK-12331] Introduce 
partition/gate setup to decouple task registration with NetworkEnvironment
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/8416#discussion_r283197233
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/core/memory/MemorySegmentProvider.java
 ##########
 @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.flink.core.memory;
+
+import java.io.IOException;
+import java.util.Collection;
+
+/**
+ * The provider used for requesting and releasing batch of memory segments.
+ */
+public interface MemorySegmentProvider {
+       /** Requests default number of memory segments. */
+       Collection<MemorySegment> requestMemorySegments() throws IOException;
+
+       Collection<MemorySegment> requestMemorySegments(int numRequiredBuffers) 
throws IOException;
 
 Review comment:
   If we only consider the semantics of `MemorySegmentProvider` interface, the 
`requestMemorySegments()` is a bit redundant, which could be replaced by 
`requestMemorySegments(int numRequiredBuffers)`. The only reason we keep both 
methods is that it seems not elegant to maintain `networkBuffersPerChannel` in 
`SingleInputGate`.
   
   TBH, I do not think it is worth defining this new interface not very clean 
to accommodate the implementation. Because `requestMemorySegments()` seems 
blurry for the usage which relies on the default value, and we should also 
consider if the default value is 0, whether the returned collection is null or 
empty size. 
   In addition, `requestMemorySegments(int numRequiredBuffers)` is only used 
for tests ATM.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to