I've read the two drafts. They are using different mechanisms and their goals
are not completely the same. I support adopting both.
Regards & Thanks！
Wei PAN (潘伟)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tero Kivinen <kivi...@iki.fi>
> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 10:49 PM
> To: ipsec@ietf.org
> Subject: [IPsec] ESP ping drafts
>
> We have draft-colitti-ipsecme-esp-ping [1] and
> draft-antony-ipsecme-encrypted-esp-ping [2] both of which propose ESP
> ping, but on the different level, and each of those provide different
level of
> debugging capabilities.
>
> The question I have for the WG, do we need both?
>
> If we only need one, which one?
>
> If we need both then should we go forward with both of them in separate
> drafts, or combine them to one draft?
>
> If you can send your comments to this thread by the end of month, so I
> can then do WG adoption call/calls before Bangkok meeting.
>
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-colitti-ipsecme-esp-ping/
> [2]
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-antony-ipsecme-encrypted-esp-pin
> g/
> --
> kivi...@iki.fi
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org
