Tero Kivinen <kivi...@iki.fi> wrote:
> We have draft-colitti-ipsecme-esp-ping [1] and
> draft-antony-ipsecme-encrypted-esp-ping [2] both of which propose ESP
> ping, but on the different level, and each of those provide different
> level of debugging capabilities.
I have read both.
> The question I have for the WG, do we need both?
Yes. The use cases and the target audiences are vastly different.
> If we need both then should we go forward with both of them in
> separate drafts, or combine them to one draft?
Separate drafts.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org
