On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 04:49:15PM +0200, Tero Kivinen wrote: > We have draft-colitti-ipsecme-esp-ping [1] and > draft-antony-ipsecme-encrypted-esp-ping [2] both of which propose ESP > ping, but on the different level, and each of those provide different > level of debugging capabilities.
I have read both (and I'm a co-author of one). > > The question I have for the WG, do we need both? Yes. > > If we only need one, which one? > > If we need both then should we go forward with both of them in > separate drafts, or combine them to one draft? I support WG adoption for both as separate drafts. Steffen _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org
