Russ, > > It is a replacement (as opposed to a wrapper) if the portions of the packet > that are covered by the ICV are different.
Would it help if WESP is renamed to something else? Since we're discussing the fundamental principles of the protocol, i see no reason why we cant change the name, if that helps. I think its the "Wrapped" in the WESP thats causing most heart burn, lets change that to something else .. something thats appeases everyone. Jack _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
