Jack:
The name sets incorrect expectations, but that is not on my list of
concerns.
Russ
On 1/5/2010 7:01 PM, Jack Kohn wrote:
Russ,
It is a replacement (as opposed to a wrapper) if the portions of the packet
that are covered by the ICV are different.
Would it help if WESP is renamed to something else? Since we're
discussing the fundamental principles of the protocol, i see no reason
why we cant change the name, if that helps. I think its the "Wrapped"
in the WESP thats causing most heart burn, lets change that to
something else .. something thats appeases everyone.
Jack
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
