At 11:08 AM -0800 1/5/10, gabriel montenegro wrote: >But I'd also like to question the process being followed.
And I would like to answer. In short: the IESG is responsible for the output of the IETF. This is one such output. The IESG chartered the WG for a particular item, and there is a question about whether what we produced matches that charter, and if it doesn't, is it still OK. >We've discussed these points numerous times >in f2f meetings, on the mailing list, at virtual interims, etc. So I'm >surprised to see the already >established consensus being questioned all over again. The IESG was not part of those discussions; they are reviewing the work that this WG sent to them. >But even if folks had not paid attention, that is no excuse for derailing the >process. A consensus call is not "derailing the process": it is just the opposite. --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
