At 11:25 AM -0800 1/5/10, gabriel montenegro wrote: >I fully agree that a consensus call is an integral part of the IETF process. > >But what we're seeing here is not one but a plurality of consensus calls.
The two questions that Yaron asked are related to the questions from the IESG. >I would have expected the response to the IESG to be: yes, this was the >consensus arrived >in the WG at time X, here are further details, etc. The IESG fully understands that there was rough consensus; that's not what they are asking. They want to know if there was a strong consensus, and did we see that we were straying from the charter. >What we're seeing is: oh, ok, let's do it all over again. That is one possibility; another is "OK, that's fine". But it is the IESG that gets to make that determination, not the WG. --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
