On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Sebastian Bergmann <sebast...@php.net> > wrote: > > > Am 26.01.2015 um 13:56 schrieb Lester Caine: > > > how would YOU propose to replace it? > > > > I am not talking about replacing but removing. > > > > -- > > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > I could accept that for pear (as composer already support installation of > pear packages and just as wide spread as pear is/was), but imo we can't > ship php without a tool to install additional pecl extensions. > Maybe it's just me who thinks this way (and I know about pickle, so one > could argue that from user pov it would be as easy as 1, install composer, > 2, install pickle with composer 3, install your pecl ext with pickle. > I'd argue that our user base has vastly more interest in installing PHP packages using Composer than it has interest in installing PHP extensions using PECL. And yet people seem to cope just fine with having to install Composer separately. In the end it's just one extra command. Nikita
