On Jan 27, 2015 12:01 PM, "Pierre Joye" <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jan 27, 2015 2:29 AM, "Derick Rethans" <der...@php.net> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Sebastian Bergmann <sebast...@php.net> wrote: > > > > > > > Am 26.01.2015 um 13:56 schrieb Lester Caine: > > > > > how would YOU propose to replace it? > > > > > > > > I am not talking about replacing but removing. > > > > > > > I could accept that for pear (as composer already support installation > > > of pear packages and just as wide spread as pear is/was), but imo we > > > can't ship php without a tool to install additional pecl extensions. > > > Maybe it's just me who thinks this way (and I know about pickle, so > > > one could argue that from user pov it would be > > > > > as easy as 1, install composer, > > > 2, install pickle with composer 3, install your pecl ext with pickle. > > > > That is not easy. Certainly not as easy as just "pecl install > > <extension>" anything similar short of that is not sufficient. > > pickle install <extension> > > Or if your composer based project needs an ext, composer will do that for you. > > Easy enough?
I forgot to mention that you do not need composer to run or install pickle. Just grab the phar. Fully independent and stand alone.
