On 22/07/14 13:17, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > The discussion seems to be sidetracked by the topic on when should we > release PHP-NEXT and what else should it contains. > Could we agree to put that aside for now, and agree to discuss this later, > after we managed to have a consensus on merging phpng to master? > I think that it is an important question, but not having phpng in master > block the other features/changes as well, and we don't have to decide about > the roadmap/features for PHP-NEXT right now.
PHPNext is a side issue as it does not need phpng ... What seems to be missing here is any real possibility of a review of all the aspects of phpng and IF each of those make sense - in light of developments others have been working on. It does sound very much as if phpng is already a done deal and it just need to be rubber stamped into the main development stream? There has been complaints about not being able to review decisions made behind closed doors but my own concern as always is the effect on extensions I use. These sorts of substantial reworks broke interbase for many versions back in the 5.0/5.1 days and it was not until 5.1.6 that a working version was restored! Interbase is not even included in phpng yet ... as are other database interfaces ... areas where performance can be tuned by offloading work rather than downloading data unnecessarily. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
