On 22/07/2014 15:37, Derick Rethans wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jul 2014, Etienne Kneuss wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Zeev Suraski <z...@zend.com> wrote: >> >>> Once the RFC is approved (I hope) >> >> Before the merge RFC can be considered for voting, I think it is >> critical that you provide a comprehensive migration guide highlighting >> the changes required from core developers. This means >> https://wiki.php.net/phpng-upgrading should be completed to reflect >> all changes. >> >> It is only then that we can vote with knowledge of how much this big >> patch affects the codebase. > > *this* is something I very much would like to see too.
I agree. It might sound silly, but it would also be interesting to know what could be the effect of phpng on the potential ideas for php6/7 from https://wiki.php.net/ideas/php6 (if any). For most of them it's pretty clear that there's isn't an overlap, but how about unicode support? Its implementation might undo or reduce some of the performance gains obtained in phpng. Or, if you put it the other way around: if we merge phpng to master it might not be acceptable to think about adding utf8 support. Cheers -- Matteo Beccati Development & Consulting - http://www.beccati.com/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
