On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Matteo Beccati <p...@beccati.com> wrote:
> On 22/07/2014 15:37, Derick Rethans wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Jul 2014, Etienne Kneuss wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Zeev Suraski <z...@zend.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Once the RFC is approved (I hope) > >> > >> Before the merge RFC can be considered for voting, I think it is > >> critical that you provide a comprehensive migration guide highlighting > >> the changes required from core developers. This means > >> https://wiki.php.net/phpng-upgrading should be completed to reflect > >> all changes. > >> > >> It is only then that we can vote with knowledge of how much this big > >> patch affects the codebase. > > > > *this* is something I very much would like to see too. > > I agree. > > It might sound silly, but it would also be interesting to know what > could be the effect of phpng on the potential ideas for php6/7 from > https://wiki.php.net/ideas/php6 (if any). > > For most of them it's pretty clear that there's isn't an overlap, but > how about unicode support? Its implementation might undo or reduce some > of the performance gains obtained in phpng. Or, if you put it the other > way around: if we merge phpng to master it might not be acceptable to > think about adding utf8 support. > One can make wishlists, but I don't think we have any people who is familiar with the area and willing to work for this to happen(unfortunately). Of course such a person/group of people can step up and would be welcome to do so, but I see no point of trying to feature box a release without having anybody actually working towards those goals. -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
