> Ok ... so as Raj says ... blocking mails at recipient level didn't bounce them
> back to where I wanted. And I can make out from what Tarun says ... they went
> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> So I guess I'd rather let the Return-Path be set to the defaults and ensure
> bounce back at the cost of band-width.
> (and again try that experiment)
Good sense prevails !! Cheers
If you are blocked from sending mail at MTA level(which is possible if [EMAIL
PROTECTED] doesn't like replying back to your friends service provider's abuse desk
after taking up the issue with you or other types of clueless behavior)
then you(along with a few more @vsnl.com users) will get a bounce back at
localhost's(your localhost)
administrative alias(most likely - root) since the return-to address doesn't give the
right address.
If if its a delivery failure or a MUA level blocking, then a bounce back
will fail and mail will be sent to the postmaster ( or some other
administrative) alias of the MX mailhost, which is then likely to be
looked at by abuse desk ( Ideally).
Tarun Dua
================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in subject header.
Check archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd%40wpaa.org
